IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrett Cammarata Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Maple Grove High USHS-MN 24 6 11 17 0.708 0.1907 0.1934 0.1720 0.1745
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 25 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 46 23 30 53 1.152 0.1388 0.1291 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 24 9 11 20 0.833
2021-22 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 27 6 16 22 0.815
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 8 3 5 8 1.000
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 6 11 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2019-20 · Bethel
+388.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38400
Forward overall
#1752
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cameron Coutre
Northland · 2014-15
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Salituro
Hobart · 2006-07
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Johan Granath
New England College · 2002-03
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.