IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Alexeev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 46 9 10 19 0.413 0.0896 0.1002 0.3195 0.3573
2017-18 Toronto Patriots OJHL 48 8 13 21 0.438 0.1072 0.1140 0.3012 0.3202
2018-19 Toronto Patriots OJHL 45 14 18 32 0.711 0.1743 0.1768 0.4896 0.4965
2019-20 Toronto Patriots OJHL 39 14 29 43 1.103 0.2702 0.2702 0.7591 0.7591
2020-21 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 15 3 6 9 0.600 0.2312 0.2312 0.8732 0.8732
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 7 1 2 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2021-22 · Hobart
+230.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20819
Forward overall
#957
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Racino
Western New England · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor van Weelie
Concordia · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matteo Viglino
New England College · 2022-23
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.