IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Hawkinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Lincoln Stars USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 46 1 7 8 0.174 0.1107 0.1159 0.5211 0.5455
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 12 6 18 0.316 0.2011 0.1998 0.9464 0.9403
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Denver D1 NCHC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Denver D1 NCHC SO 3 0 1 1 0.333
2014-15 Denver D1 NCHC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Denver D1 NCHC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25353
Forward overall
#1024
Forward born in 1994
#3255
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Colin Staub
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew McDonald
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Ledford
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Air Force (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Wandmacher
Saint John's · 2019-20
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave McKenna
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2005-06
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.