← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Wandmacher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Louis Park USHS-MN 25 11 31 42 1.680 0.2127 0.2127 0.4081 0.4081
2020-21 St. Louis Park USHS-MN 15 9 13 22 1.467 0.1857 0.1857 0.3563 0.3563
2021-22 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 51 3 12 15 0.294 0.1081 0.1095 0.3104 0.3143
2022-23 NAHL 61 11 16 27 0.443 0.1626 0.1566 0.4672 0.4501
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 28 7 18 25 0.893
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 16 0 11 11 0.688
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 25 7 7 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2023-24 · Saint John's
+375.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27097
Forward overall
#1545
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2023-24
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.