IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Walker Hamilton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 47 13 31 44 0.936 0.1128 0.1066 0.2957 0.2794
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 23 2 3 5 0.217
2018-19 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 25 4 7 11 0.440
2017-18 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2017-18 · Framingham State
+377.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10627
Defenseman overall
#1570
Defenseman born in 1996
#908
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Frary
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Erick Galt
Concordia · 2007-08
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.