IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 47 3 7 10 0.213 0.0782 0.0777 0.2246 0.2231
2005-06 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 58 6 25 31 0.534 0.1964 0.1853 0.5642 0.5324
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 23 5 11 16 0.696
2008-09 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 28 5 9 14 0.500
2007-08 Air Force D1 AHA SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Air Force D1 AHA FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2003-04 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2002-03 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2002-03 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 13 2 3 5 0.385
2001-02 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 25 5 3 8 0.320
2001-02 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9680
Defenseman overall
#1085
Defenseman born in 1985
#3442
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Love
Neumann · 2008-09
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Strawn
Endicott · 2018-19
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Whidden
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.