IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Valenti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-08-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Coquitlam Express BCHL 43 6 6 12 0.279 0.1086 0.1122 0.4070 0.4206
2008-09 — BCHL 39 9 19 28 0.718 0.2794 0.2770 1.0469 1.0380
2009-10 Merritt Centennials BCHL 43 17 23 40 0.930 0.3620 0.3392 1.3565 1.2710
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 28 9 14 23 0.821
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 28 7 12 19 0.679
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 22 6 7 13 0.591
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 26 6 9 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2010-11 · St. Scholastica
+114.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10357
Forward overall
#409
Forward born in 1989
#768
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.