| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 53 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.226 | 0.1442 | 0.1412 | 0.6785 | 0.6642 |
| 2012-13 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 41 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.317 | 0.2019 | 0.1869 | 0.9503 | 0.8797 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC | SO | 12 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.167 |
| 2013-14 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC | FR | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.