IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 40 15 13 28 0.700 0.1347 0.1421 0.4414 0.4655
2010-11 — MJHL 60 15 31 46 0.767 0.1476 0.1485 0.4835 0.4864
2011-12 — MJHL 49 18 25 43 0.878 0.1689 0.1614 0.5534 0.5289
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 24 5 14 19 0.792
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 23 10 8 18 0.783
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 26 13 17 30 1.154
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 22 8 14 22 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2012-13 · Elmira
+647.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27186
Forward overall
#975
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Kearney
Williams · 2024-25
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bannister
Canton · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Strawn
Endicott · 2018-19
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.