IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Bannister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Caledon Admirals OJHL 20 3 3 6 0.300 0.0838 0.0906 0.2070 0.2239
2016-17 Toronto Patriots OJHL 49 9 13 22 0.449 0.1255 0.1301 0.3099 0.3213
2017-18 Toronto Patriots OJHL 53 21 39 60 1.132 0.3163 0.3127 0.7813 0.7725
2018-19 — OJHL 59 32 36 68 1.153 0.3220 0.3026 0.7953 0.7474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canton D3 — FR 24 7 4 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2019-20 · Canton
+74.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12331
Forward overall
#426
Forward born in 1998
#661
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Ruberto
Hamilton · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.