← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Hartman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-10 Country: USA
Hobart
Verbal SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 28 22 17 39 1.393 0.1822 0.1822 0.4728 0.4728
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 47 23 30 53 1.128 0.4598 0.4421 0.9064 0.8715
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC SR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC 23 1 2 3 0.130
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 31 20 25 45 1.452
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 29 7 12 19 0.655
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2022-23 · Hobart
+73.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4102
Forward overall
#154
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Hobart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.87
actual FR PPG at Hobart
0.56
actual FR PPG at Hobart
0.64
actual FR PPG at Hobart
1.00
actual FR PPG at Hobart

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.