← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brycon Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 40 28 25 53 1.325 0.1663 0.1881 0.5278 0.6089
2013-14 NAHL 30 2 1 3 0.100 0.0367 0.0405 0.1056 0.1165
2014-15 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 40 17 13 30 0.750 0.1733 0.1763 0.3670 0.3734
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 17 11 8 19 1.118 0.2582 0.2511
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D1 SO 1 1 0 1 1.000
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 SO 1 1 0 1 1.000
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 FR 18 7 7 14 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2017-18 · Bryn Athyn
+310.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19148
Forward overall
#751
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Assumption · 2017-18
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.