IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Zampanti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 34 13 17 30 0.882 0.1154 0.1154 0.2995 0.2994
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 — 30 7 6 13 0.433
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 — 10 3 1 4 0.400
2019-20 Assumption D1 NE10 SO 24 12 12 24 1.000
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 — 24 12 12 24 1.000
2018-19 Assumption D1 NE10 FR 26 3 8 11 0.423
2018-19 Assumption D2 NE10 — 26 3 8 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2018-19 · Assumption
+328.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16956
Forward overall
#793
Forward born in 1998
#1045
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Parent
Alvernia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Pionk
Western New England · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Phillip Middleton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.