IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Andrle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 15 0 3 3 0.200 0.1274 0.1231 0.5993 0.5790
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 56 16 18 34 0.607 0.2254 0.2152 0.6428 0.6136
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Army D1 AHA SR 34 8 12 20 0.588
2016-17 Army D1 AHA JR 37 14 14 28 0.757
2015-16 Army D1 AHA SO 38 13 20 33 0.868
2014-15 Army D1 AHA FR 32 4 13 17 0.531
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2014-15 · Army
+247.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22157
Forward overall
#837
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bret Adams
Curry · 2002-03
1.759 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.