← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Horacek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 9 2 3 5 0.556 0.2063 0.2063 0.5883 0.5883
2021-22 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 44 5 10 15 0.341 0.1266 0.1345 0.3609 0.3834
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 40 6 19 25 0.625 0.2321 0.2351 0.6617 0.6704
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 59 19 26 45 0.763 0.2832 0.2734 0.8075 0.7795
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 28 1 9 10 0.357
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 25 9 11 20 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2024-25 · SUNY Oswego
+262.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16545
Forward overall
#639
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.