IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Cuce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 10 24 34 0.773 0.2320 0.2257 0.6365 0.6192
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 25 16 14 30 1.200
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 13 20 33 1.222
2017-18 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 28 14 25 39 1.393
2016-17 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 25 6 19 25 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2016-17 · Elmira
+417.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16486
Forward overall
#611
Forward born in 1995
#65
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ron Lindgren
Aurora · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.