IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ron Lindgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Mason City Toros NA3HL 44 5 24 29 0.659 0.0794 0.0778 0.2082 0.2040
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 46 10 28 38 0.826 0.0995 0.0936 0.2610 0.2455
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2016-17 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2015-16 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 25 6 4 10 0.400
2014-15 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 4 1 2 3 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2014-15 · Aurora
+810.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13553
Defenseman overall
#1613
Defenseman born in 1993
#1415
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Chuckran
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Terry Leabo
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Cassidy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.