IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Chuckran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 37 3 20 23 0.622 0.1334 0.1344 — —
2014-15 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 12 21 33 0.750 0.1610 0.1546 0.3673 0.3528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 26 1 11 12 0.462
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 31 0 10 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2015-16 · UMass Boston
+133.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7143
Defenseman overall
#1126
Defenseman born in 1994
#492
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Marcoux
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Renato Engler
Lawrence · 2011-12
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Scott
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.