← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHLP 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 East Coast Wizards EHL 44 11 11 22 0.500 0.1073 0.1073 0.2449 0.2449
2020-21 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 11 9 20 0.526 0.1129 0.1129 0.2577 0.2577
2021-22 East Coast Wizards EHL 36 12 21 33 0.917 0.1967 0.1927 0.4489 0.4397
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 7 4 3 7 1.000
2024-25 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 18 1 3 4 0.222
2023-24 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 21 5 2 7 0.333
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 21 5 3 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Suffolk
+130.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27730
Forward overall
#1094
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.