← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHLP 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 East Coast Wizards EHL 44 11 11 22 0.500 0.1155 0.1155 0.2447 0.2447
2020-21 East Coast Wizards EHL 38 11 9 20 0.526 0.1216 0.1216 0.2575 0.2575
2021-22 East Coast Wizards EHL 36 12 21 33 0.917 0.2118 0.2075 0.4485 0.4393
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 7 4 3 7 1.000
2024-25 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 18 1 3 4 0.222
2023-24 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 21 5 2 7 0.333
2022-23 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 21 5 3 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Suffolk
+114.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22278
Forward overall
#1100
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.