IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyllian Kirkwood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-09-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Huntsville Otters OJHL 49 5 17 22 0.449 0.1100 0.1125 0.3091 0.3161
2010-11 Huntsville Otters OJHL 50 8 20 28 0.560 0.1373 0.1340 0.3856 0.3764
2011-12 — OJHL 48 3 33 36 0.750 0.1838 0.1713 0.5164 0.4813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 27 4 18 22 0.815
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 27 6 16 22 0.815
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 7 12 19 0.731
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 24 3 11 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2012-13 · Westfield State
+295.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7705
Defenseman overall
#1066
Defenseman born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Zeleznikar
Concordia · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Medure
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Tobias
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.