IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talon Medure Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bloomington Jefferson High USHS-MN 23 3 5 8 0.348 0.0936 0.0915 0.0845 0.0826
2015-16 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.0602 0.0630 0.1580 0.1654
2016-17 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 44 20 26 46 1.046 0.1260 0.1256 0.3303 0.3292
2017-18 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 46 25 30 55 1.196 0.1441 0.1363 0.3777 0.3572
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 — FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32077
Forward overall
#1450
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keenan McNeill
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Donnie Hallmark
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kangas
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.