IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kangas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 35 9 7 16 0.457 0.1056 0.1014 0.2237 0.2147
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 11 2 2 4 0.364
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 25 12 14 26 1.040
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 27 6 15 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2014-15 · SUNY Brockport
+796.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35175
Forward overall
#1234
Forward born in 1993
#1261
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Koblick
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Annunziato
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Hodnicki
Utica · 2005-06
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.