IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Hodnicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Soo Indians NAHL 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.0696 0.0725 0.1985 0.2069
2004-05 Soo Indians NAHL 24 1 2 3 0.125 0.0464 0.0460 0.1323 0.1313
2005-06 Northern Michigan Black Bears NOJHL 11 2 6 8 0.727 0.1226 0.1160 0.3022 0.2860
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA GR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Adrian D3 — SR 14 0 6 6 0.429
2008-09 Adrian D3 — JR 16 0 3 3 0.188
2007-08 Adrian D3 — SO 23 1 6 7 0.304
2005-06 Utica D3 — FR 17 1 4 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2005-06 · Utica
+450.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14321
Defenseman overall
#1399
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matteo Peca
Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Waltman
Skidmore · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Atkinson
Castleton · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.