IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matteo Peca Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 20 3 3 6 0.300 0.0506 0.0506 0.1246 0.1246
2021-22 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 31 11 11 22 0.710 0.1197 0.1113 0.2949 0.2743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 SR 29 2 4 6 0.207
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 JR 21 3 4 7 0.333
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SO 19 1 4 5 0.263
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37659
Forward overall
#1673
Forward born in 2001
#610
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Clay Cross
Marian · 2015-16
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunn
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Erick Galt
Concordia · 2007-08
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.