IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erick Galt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Lincoln Stars USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 50 5 10 15 0.300 0.1114 0.1106 — —
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 38 5 19 24 0.632 0.2345 0.2214 0.6687 0.6313
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Concordia D3 — SR 23 4 11 15 0.652
2010-11 Concordia D3 — JR 27 3 22 25 0.926
2009-10 Concordia D3 — SO 23 2 13 15 0.652
2008-09 Concordia D3 — FR 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2008-09 · Concordia
+150.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7736
Defenseman overall
#1127
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Owens
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Deaglan Kelly
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Altenbernd
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.