IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erick Galt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Lincoln Stars USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 50 5 10 15 0.300 0.1102 0.1094 — —
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 38 5 19 24 0.632 0.2320 0.2190 0.6667 0.6294
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 23 4 11 15 0.652
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 3 22 25 0.926
2009-10 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 2 13 15 0.652
2008-09 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2008-09 · Concordia
+153.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10402
Defenseman overall
#1169
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Owens
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua German
Arcadia · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Logar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.