IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua German Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 41 9 23 32 0.780 0.1021 0.1021 0.2649 0.2649
2020-21 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 36 3 10 13 0.361 0.0472 0.0472 0.1226 0.1226
2021-22 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 33 9 20 29 0.879 0.1149 0.1149 — —
2022-23 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 41 15 29 44 1.073 0.1404 0.1334 0.3642 0.3462
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC — 22 1 12 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2023-24 · Arcadia
+397.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3686
Defenseman overall
#951
Defenseman born in 2002
#1133
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Bromberg
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Baldassare
Assumption · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.