IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Bromberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 42 10 20 30 0.714 0.0861 0.0856 0.2256 0.2243
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 44 10 28 38 0.864 0.1041 0.0984 0.2728 0.2579
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 23 3 5 8 0.348
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 28 2 7 9 0.321
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12745
Defenseman overall
#1661
Defenseman born in 1995
#1257
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Bushey
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frédérick Allaire
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Fylling
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.