IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bushey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 54 6 11 17 0.315 0.1169 0.1175 0.3333 0.3351
2013-14 — NAHL 54 3 20 23 0.426 0.1581 0.1510 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 28 1 7 8 0.286
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 25 4 16 20 0.800
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 25 1 5 6 0.240
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 23 5 9 14 0.609
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2014-15 · Gustavus Adolphus
+368.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7810
Defenseman overall
#1143
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Rivait
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tucker Coborn
Concordia · 2010-11
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Paul
Bethel · 2007-08
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.