IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Coborn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 10 18 28 0.483 0.1793 0.1804 0.5112 0.5143
2011-12 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 56 16 30 46 0.821 0.3050 0.2918 0.8697 0.8321
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 18 2 8 10 0.556
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 7 9 16 0.615
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 5 8 13 0.500
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 8 10 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2012-13 · Concordia
+227.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14274
Forward overall
#546
Forward born in 1991
#980
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Mooney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.