IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Mooney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Aurora Tigers OJHL 45 6 12 18 0.400 0.1118 0.1145 0.2760 0.2826
2009-10 North York Rangers OJHL 49 26 34 60 1.224 0.3421 0.3323 0.8450 0.8208
2010-11 North York Rangers OJHL 50 23 43 66 1.320 0.3688 0.3410 0.9109 0.8423
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 26 5 8 13 0.500
2013-14 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 26 12 16 28 1.077
2012-13 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 11 1 2 3 0.273
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 27 6 11 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+117.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10303
Forward overall
#445
Forward born in 1990
#472
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.