IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Valadao Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 North York Rangers OJHL 46 5 13 18 0.391 0.1093 0.1177 0.2700 0.2907
2011-12 North York Rangers OJHL 47 13 20 33 0.702 0.1962 0.2026 0.4845 0.5003
2012-13 North York Rangers OJHL 46 15 28 43 0.935 0.2612 0.2567 0.6451 0.6340
2013-14 North York Rangers OJHL 53 21 40 61 1.151 0.3216 0.2997 0.7942 0.7400
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 11 23 34 1.308
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE JR 26 11 12 23 0.885
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE SO 20 4 10 14 0.700
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE FR 22 8 8 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2014-15 · Curry
+200.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12441
Forward overall
#458
Forward born in 1993
#673
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.