← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braedyn Aubin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Markham Royals OJHL 53 28 42 70 1.321 0.3690 0.3608 0.9115 0.8911
2018-19 Markham Royals OJHL 54 29 44 73 1.352 0.3777 0.3508 0.9329 0.8664
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 23 5 5 10 0.435
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 8 0 2 2 0.250
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 24 6 7 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2019-20 · Norwich
+78.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6406
Forward overall
#195
Forward born in 1998
#153
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.