← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Egan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0353 0.0372 0.1008 0.1063
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 56 8 16 24 0.429 0.1591 0.1592 0.4538 0.4541
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 59 20 31 51 0.864 0.3210 0.3053 0.9152 0.8705
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA 6 1 0 1 0.167
2021-22 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 26 15 17 32 1.231
2020-21 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 8 3 6 9 1.125
2019-20 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 25 14 12 26 1.040
2018-19 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 27 12 15 27 1.000
2008-09 SUNY Cortland D3 SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2007-08 SUNY Cortland D3 JR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2006-07 SUNY Cortland D3 SO 22 2 5 7 0.318
2005-06 SUNY Cortland D3 FR 24 2 5 7 0.292

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19598
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 1997
#1818
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.