| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Calgary Canucks | AJHL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.3354 | 0.3677 | 0.9254 | 1.0144 |
| 2009-10 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 60 | 12 | 21 | 33 | 0.550 | 0.2119 | 0.2202 | 0.8004 | 0.8317 |
| 2010-11 | — | BCHL | 32 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 0.812 | 0.3131 | 0.3107 | 1.1824 | 1.1732 |
| 2011-12 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 32 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 0.969 | 0.3733 | 0.3499 | 1.4099 | 1.3214 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | SR | 28 | 13 | 27 | 40 | 1.429 |
| 2014-15 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | JR | 26 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 1.154 |
| 2013-14 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | SO | 29 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 0.862 |
| 2012-13 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | FR | 27 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 0.889 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.