IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Nowakowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Calgary Canucks AJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.3340 0.3661 0.9283 1.0176
2009-10 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 60 12 21 33 0.550 0.2141 0.2225 0.8021 0.8334
2010-11 — BCHL 32 11 15 26 0.812 0.3162 0.3137 1.1849 1.1757
2011-12 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 32 14 17 31 0.969 0.3771 0.3534 1.4128 1.3241
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 28 13 27 40 1.429
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 26 12 18 30 1.154
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 29 9 16 25 0.862
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 27 6 18 24 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2012-13 · St. Scholastica
+207.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5371
Forward overall
#202
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Caron
Saint Michael's · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Sharkey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.