IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Fylling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 31 0 5 5 0.161 0.0599 0.0595 0.1708 0.1696
2005-06 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 46 11 14 25 0.543 0.2018 0.1904 0.5755 0.5430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — SR 13 3 1 4 0.308
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 — JR 22 2 5 7 0.318
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 — SO 29 0 6 6 0.207
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 — FR 15 3 4 7 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2006-07 · St. Norbert
+294.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28827
Forward overall
#1034
Forward born in 1985
#3393
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Nelson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Huffnagle
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Leo Bacallao
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.