IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Huffnagle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 34 5 15 20 0.588 0.1262 0.1278 0.2880 0.2917
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 15 37 52 1.182 0.3549 0.3455 0.9734 0.9475
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 7 1 3 4 0.571
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 20 4 14 18 0.900
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 13 2 4 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · SUNY Oswego
+108.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13560
Forward overall
#480
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.