IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tio D'Addario Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Surrey Eagles BCHL 18 6 3 9 0.500 0.1926 0.1926 0.7277 0.7277
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 18 5 6 11 0.611 0.2050 0.2022 0.5655 0.5578
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 55 22 44 66 1.200 0.2603 0.2447 0.9284 0.8726
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 27 10 11 21 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2023-24 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+299.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23225
Forward overall
#1280
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.