| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 56 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 0.500 | 0.1946 | 0.1930 | 0.7291 | 0.7229 |
| 2004-05 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 58 | 37 | 23 | 60 | 1.034 | 0.4026 | 0.3804 | 1.5086 | 1.4255 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SR | 29 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 0.966 |
| 2007-08 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | JR | 28 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.643 |
| 2006-07 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SO | 28 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.536 |
| 2005-06 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | FR | 26 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.923 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.