IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-06-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 St. Albert Saints AJHL 62 17 44 61 0.984 0.3300 0.3190 0.9105 0.8801
2001-02 St. Albert Saints AJHL 61 15 52 67 1.098 0.3684 0.3448 1.0165 0.9515
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 3 0 4 4 1.333
2002-03 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 29 18 20 38 1.310
2002-03 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 28 6 5 11 0.393
2001-02 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 34 4 8 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2001-02 · Wisconsin-Superior
+29.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12273
Forward overall
#397
Forward born in 1981
#167
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Speck
Endicott · 2024-25
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.