← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 USPHL-Premier 37 21 23 44 1.189 0.1555 0.1577 0.4036 0.4092
2018-19 NA3HL 20 16 11 27 1.350 0.1694 0.1618
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 23 6 8 14 0.609
2020-21 New England College D1 LittleEast SO 10 0 4 4 0.400
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 10 0 4 4 0.400
2019-20 New England College D1 LittleEast FR 27 6 13 19 0.704
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 27 6 13 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2019-20 · New England College
+413.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
5%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12543
Forward overall
#566
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.