IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Skrelja Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Austin Bruins NAHL 21 1 0 1 0.048 0.0177 0.0188 0.0504 0.0535
2018-19 Soo Eagles NOJHL 40 18 23 41 1.025 0.1728 0.1723 0.4259 0.4246
2019-20 Soo Eagles NOJHL 54 28 26 54 1.000 0.1686 0.1686 0.4155 0.4155
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30350
Forward overall
#1332
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Westmark
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Juron
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2005-06
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.