IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Weberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-08 Country: Norway
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 47 6 5 11 0.234 0.1380 0.1349 0.7028 0.6870
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 58 14 9 23 0.397 0.2340 0.2178 1.1911 1.1087
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2015-16 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 30 2 4 6 0.200
2014-15 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#28007
Forward overall
#962
Forward born in 1993
#2649
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Hovanec
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.