IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Grandbois Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 17 6 3 9 0.529 0.0692 0.0767 0.1797 0.1992
2022-23 Soo Eagles NOJHL 22 8 8 16 0.727 0.1215 0.1270 0.3028 0.3166
2023-24 — OJHL 28 3 4 7 0.250 0.0613 0.0608 0.1721 0.1706
2024-25 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 16 13 10 23 1.438 0.1880 0.1791 0.4879 0.4647
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 26 13 7 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2025-26 · Worcester State
+581.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11081
Forward overall
#470
Forward born in 2004
#542
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McBride
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bax
Utica · 2023-24
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.