IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Grandbois Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 17 6 3 9 0.529 0.1745 0.1934 0.1801 0.1996
2022-23 Soo Eagles NOJHL 22 8 8 16 0.727 0.1850 0.1934 0.3018 0.3155
2023-24 — OJHL 28 3 4 7 0.250 0.0751 0.0744 0.1711 0.1696
2024-25 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 16 13 10 23 1.438 0.4738 0.4513 0.4890 0.4658
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 26 13 7 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2025-26 · Worcester State
+199.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10622
Forward overall
#449
Forward born in 2004
#538
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Camden Markham
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McBride
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Orn
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.