← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Bax Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0490 0.0490 0.1369 0.1369
2020-21 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 12 4 6 10 0.833 0.0940 0.0940 0.2835 0.2835
2021-22 Collingwood Blues OJHL 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0471 0.0491 0.1316 0.1372
2022-23 Dauphin Kings MJHL 49 5 19 24 0.490 0.0943 0.0948 0.3087 0.3103
2023-24 Dauphin Kings MJHL 30 12 20 32 1.067 0.2053 0.1956 0.6722 0.6405
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC 28 2 13 15 0.536
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC 30 2 11 13 0.433
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Utica
+195.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7385
Defenseman overall
#1747
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2006-07
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2008-09
0.562 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.