IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Larkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Michigan Warriors NAHL 50 7 11 18 0.360 0.1337 0.1355 0.3812 0.3863
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 58 23 14 37 0.638 0.2369 0.2282 0.6754 0.6506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 27 24 22 46 1.704
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 26 20 19 39 1.500
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 31 10 26 36 1.161
2014-15 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 27 10 17 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2014-15 · UMass Boston
+511.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20920
Forward overall
#796
Forward born in 1993
#2047
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Law
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Penner
Concordia Wisconsin · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Haeg
St. John's · 2010-11
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.