IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Larkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Michigan Warriors NAHL 50 7 11 18 0.360 0.1323 0.1341 0.3800 0.3851
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 58 23 14 37 0.638 0.2344 0.2258 0.6733 0.6486
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 27 24 22 46 1.704
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC JR 26 20 19 39 1.500
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SO 31 10 26 36 1.161
2014-15 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 27 10 17 27 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2014-15 · UMass Boston
+517.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26769
Forward overall
#917
Forward born in 1993
#2233
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rhett Evjen
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Law
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tye Battipaglia
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.