IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tye Battipaglia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 12 3 2 5 0.417 0.0545 0.0552 0.1414 0.1432
2024-25 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 50 14 14 28 0.560 0.2283 0.2225 0.4501 0.4387
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 25 14 15 29 1.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.16
2025-26 · Fitchburg State
+770.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20530
Forward overall
#1108
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braxton Powers
University of New England · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.