IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braxton Powers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.0770 0.0860 0.2695 0.3011
2022-23 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 10 14 24 0.500 0.1155 0.1242 0.4043 0.4348
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 44 22 16 38 0.864 0.1996 0.2033 0.6983 0.7114
2024-25 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 51 32 36 68 1.333 0.3081 0.3002 1.0781 1.0504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 24 2 6 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · New England
+48.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4471
Forward overall
#114
Forward born in 2004
#31
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rick Acorn
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Klugerman
Concordia (WI) · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.