IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Klugerman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 44 12 23 35 0.795 0.1328 0.1318 0.3312 0.3287
2022-23 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 55 28 35 63 1.145 0.1913 0.1816 0.4769 0.4528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 26 8 16 24 0.923
2025-26 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 26 8 16 24 0.923
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 3 12 15 0.556
2024-25 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 27 3 12 15 0.556
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 23 3 18 21 0.913
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 23 3 18 21 0.913
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2023-24 · Concordia
+559.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22962
Forward overall
#1263
Forward born in 2002
#150
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Costanzo
Endicott · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Friesen
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Roach
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.