IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Roach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 East Coast Wizards EHL 43 13 22 35 0.814 0.1747 0.1823 0.3986 0.4159
2022-23 East Coast Wizards EHL 43 18 28 46 1.070 0.2296 0.2276 0.5239 0.5194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 19 4 4 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · SUNY Brockport
+134.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19310
Forward overall
#730
Forward born in 2002
#172
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Routh
Saint Michael's · 2018-19
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Luedtke
Concordia · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2001-02
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.