IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Luedtke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NA3HL 33 2 7 9 0.273 0.0329 0.0329 0.0861 0.0861
2021-22 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 40 18 29 47 1.175 0.1416 0.1356 0.3712 0.3556
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 22 4 4 8 0.364
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 3 3 6 0.240
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Concordia
+279.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38948
Forward overall
#1747
Forward born in 2001
#1256
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Lukenda
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Haldane
Johnson & Wales · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Biebel
Saint Michael's · 2014-15
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.